Tag: content regulation

Access Now to Indonesia court: website blocking rules violate human rights law and constitution
Access Now, Open Net Korea, and Electronic Frontier Foundation filed an amicus curiae submission challenging the validity of Indonesia’s MR5.

Access Now, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Open Net Amicus Brief (Bahasa) on Indonesia MR5 case before the Jakarta State Administrative Court
Access Now, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Open Net submits an amicus brief asserting that Indonesia’s MR5 rules violate international law and the Constitution.

Access Now, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Open Net Amicus Brief on Indonesia MR5 case before the Jakarta State Administrative Court
Access Now, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Open Net submits an amicus brief asserting that Indonesia’s MR5 rules violate international law and the Constitution.

Las directrices de la UNESCO para regular las plataformas digitales deben centrarse en los derechos humanos para todas las personas, en todas partes

UNESCO’s guidelines for regulating digital platforms must center human rights for everyone, everywhere

Thailand: 24-hour content takedown regulation will undermine rule of law and freedom of expression online
New rules from Thailand allows the government to force online service providers and social media platforms to take down certain content without a court order.

Brazil’s Restrictive New Social Media Rules Could Be an Omen For the Future of the Internet

Ya son 28 los cubanos multados por la ‘ley azote’

Digital Security Helpline: our approach to content-related cases
Critical voices from civil society are being censored. Here’s how the Digital Security Helpline addresses cases related to content governance.

EU Parliament deletes the worst threats to freedom of expression proposed in the Terrorist Content Regulation
While we welcome the improvements to the initial European Commission proposal on this file, we doubt its objectives will be achieved. No meaningful evidence has been presented to demonstrate the need, nor the efficacy, of this new European counter-terrorism instrument.