Ghana’s anti-LGBTQ+ bill

Joint statement: civil society welcomes independent human rights assessment on Meta’s content moderation in Palestine and Israel

We, the undersigned human rights organizations, commend the publication of Business for Social Responsibility’s (BSR) Human Rights Due Diligence Report of Arabic and Hebrew content on Meta’s platforms in the Israel/Palestine context in May 2021. For years, digital and human rights organizations have been calling for an independent review of Meta’s content moderation policies. These calls came as a result of Meta’s constant and deliberate actions to censor the voices and narrative of Palestinians and those in solidarity with them. Thus, denying Palestinians their right to freedom of expression, affecting their freedom of assembly and freedom to political participation and non-discrimination and further distorting the international community’s understanding of what is happening in Palestine. 

We appreciate and value BSR’s efforts and professionalism through their assessment and independent review. We especially acknowledge their engagement with local, regional and international stakeholders and right-holders throughout the process. Launching this due diligence report  is a step in the right direction. importantly, we look forward to Meta’s unequivocal commitment to implementing the recommendations of this report. More generally, we urge Meta to take decisive action to protect the voices of Palestinians among other oppressed peoples and groups around the world. 

BSR’s findings provide further evidence of the over-enforcement of Arabic content compared to Hebrew content, and under-enforcement of content moderation policies on Hebrew language content. The latter was, according to BSR, “largely due to the lack of a Hebrew classifier,” some of these problems have been documented for years by 7amleh, The Arab Center for the Advancement of Social Media. Furthermore, the report cites adverse human rights implications to Palestinians’ right to freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, freedom to political participation, and non-discrimination. BSR also found evidence of Meta’s policies and practices leading to biased outcomes, which negatively impact Palestinian and Arabic speaking users.

Notwithstanding our support for much of BSR’s work, we must provide some important caveats that would help Meta address these problems more systemically. First, BSR distinguishes between intentional and unintentional bias, and states that it only found evidence of unintentional bias in Meta’s policies and practices. However, we have been calling Meta’s attention to the disproportionately negative impact of its content moderation on Palestinians for years. Therefore, even if the bias started out as unintentional, after knowing about the issues for years and not taking appropriate action, the unintentional became intentional. 

Furthermore, though BSR accurately identified many root causes of the over-enforcement of content moderation on Palestinian and Arabic content, they have underestimated the role of the Israeli government. The Israeli cyber unit sends tens of thousands of voluntary content takedown requests annually to Meta, and the company has historically complied around 90% of the time. This is only one example of many that highlights Israel’s special relationship with Meta, despite the extensive documentation and evidence by international, Palestinian and Israeli human rights groups, of Israel’s systematic, multidimensional violation of Palestinian human rights. Israel leverages this relationship to pressure Meta to take down Palestinian content, as Defense Minister Benny Gantz publicly did during the May 2021 uprisings

In an effort to ensure Meta fulfills its human rights obligations, BSR recommends a series of steps that also align with civil society’s repeated demands on Meta over the years. BSR stated that Meta should reevaluate certain content moderation policies, take substantial action to increase transparency around their content moderation practices and policies, invest in more precise Hebrew and Arabic language content moderation resources, and establish greater clarification around its legal obligations with regards to Foreign Terrorist Organizations and State Designated Global Terrorists. These recommendations are a step in the right direction, and need to be taken seriously by Meta. We call on Meta to provide complete transparency on voluntary content removal requests from the Israeli government, including its Cyber Unit, as well as where and how automated decision making  are being used for content moderation, and about content policies related to the classification and moderation of “terrorism” and “extremism”. 

In addition to the report’s recommendations, 7amleh’s racism and hate speech index between 6th to the 21st May 2021 showed a 15-fold increase in violent speech compared to the same time period of the previous year. Thus, Meta must improve their Hebrew language content moderation by creating a Hebrew hate speech lexicon. 

Finally, these recommendations will only be successfully implemented if Meta truly commits to a co-design process with civil society, as well as if it provides a detailed timeline for exactly how they will commit to, and implement these recommendations in full transparency and in line with the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Meta has stated that it is committed to co-design, therefore, we stand ready to work with them and we urge Meta to start the process as early as possible.


7amleh- The Arab Center for the Advancement of Social Media

Access Now

Action Center on Race & the Economy

Adalah Justice Project

Addameer Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association

Agriculture development association


American Muslims for Palestine (AMP)

Arab American University

Arab Resource & Organizing Center (AROC)

Association “Pour Jérusalem”

Association Belgo-Palestinienne WB

Association France Palestine Solidarité (AFPS)

Burj Alluqluq Social Center Society

Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies

Center for Constitutional Rights


Comité pour une Paix Juste au Proche-Orient, Luxembourg

Community Media Centre

Council for Arab-British Understanding

Defence for Children International

ECCP – European Coordination of Committees and Associations for Palestine

Electronic Frontier Foundation

Eyewitness Palestine

Fight for the Future

H&R Legal Office

Human Rights Watch


Institute for Middle East Understanding

Jordan Open Source Association

Kairos Palestine


Kayan Feminist organization


May First Movement Technology

Media Matters for Democracy



National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP)

Nederlands Palestina Komitee (NPK)

Nisaa Broadcasting Radio Company


Palestinian Center for policy research and strategic studies-MASARATtegic

Palestinian Counseling Center (PCC)

Palestinian Observatory for Fact-Checking and Media Literacy “Tahaqaq”

Palestinian vision

Palestinian Youth Association for Leadership & Rights Activation- PYALARA


Platform of French NGOs for Palestine

Ranking Digital Rights

Red en Defensa de los Derechos Digitales (R3D)




The Arab Culture Association

The Community Action Center / Al-Quds University

The East Jerusalem YMCA

The International Centre of Justice for Palestinians (ICJP)

The Jerusalem Legal Aid and Human Rights Center-

The Palestinian Coalition for the Economic, social, and cultural rights – Adala

The Palestinian Initiative for the Promotion of Global Dialogue and Democracy – MIFTAH

The Palestinian NGOs Network (PNGO)

The Right to Education Campaign – Birzeit University

U.S. Palestinian Community Network (USPCN)

Union juive française pour la paix

Vigilance for Democracy and the Civic State, Tunisia

Visualizing Palestine

Women Against Violence

Women Media and Development